It seems as though there are a load of ontologies/frameworks already defining most subjects in the world. Here's one example from the Structured Dynamics website. Type in any 'thing'...then click to move to a more broad or narrow connection:
Think of it as a framework or "world view"...that can then have data layered over it:
http://umbel.structureddynamics.com/explorer.php?concept=fibula
There are hundreds of these 'framworks'/ontologies that are available and free...interesting. ie/ Consider one with 6000 nodes that describes a community (warning big):
http://vocab.muni-ontology.org/graph_views/MUNI_spring_3_45_75_500.pdf
While these are all necessary, the details are very distracting. Consider instead, my implementation of a generic 'pod'. This can describe the actions carried out by any subject by adding complexity in layers.
No comments:
Post a Comment